Womens’ Sham Lawsuit Against Wal-Mart to be Heard by the Supreme Court

The US Supreme Court has decided to hear what appears to be a typically frivolous lawsuit brought by a group of shameful and greedy women and their shyster lawyers to extract grand sums from their employer—Wal-Mart, whose primary guilt is that of success.

CBS puts its usual liberal spin on the story with a headline disgracefully titled "Wal-Mart 'too big' to be sued?". 

Adam Sparks provides a more accurate description of the frivolous womens suit on BigGovernment.com…

Walmart is getting sued by 6 women for sex discrimination; this despite the fact that most of the employees are women. The ambulance-chasing shysters fomenting this case succeeded in getting “class” status for their few plaintiffs from the notorious 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. One of the primary tests for certifying a lawsuit as a “class” is for the court to determine whether the named plaintiffs are sufficiently representative of the class. Additionally, the court must determine if actual discrimination occurred and that this discrimination was likely to be widespread and effect a large class; in this case, a half of million female employees. [Read the full story here…]