Showing posts with label Rush Limbaugh. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rush Limbaugh. Show all posts

Monday, April 9, 2012

Wisconsin: Ground Zero in the Battle of Liberty vs. Tyranny

Rush Limbaugh on the upcoming critical recall election of Scott Walker.
"In one corner stands Governor Scott Walker who stands with fiscal sanity, economic growth, jobs and a prosperorous state. In the other corner stands crony capitalism, back door deals, budget busting salary and wage packages...in other words the familiar stentch of economic ruin ...brought by the alliance of elected Democratic and to you be labor unions."


Corporate Progressivism: Arby's Aligns with Left and Fails

Note: This Blog Was Co-Published on Breitbart.com on 4/9/12


Corporate Progressivism—the use of corporate influence to promote the progressive agenda—is a powerful tactic used by the hard left to co-opt America’s corporate sector into submission to the left’s big government version of the common good.

Corporate progressivism takes many forms. There are extreme cases of crony capitalism such as the Obama regime’s transfer of billions of taxpayer dollars to progressive fantasy (i.e. scam) businesses like the bankrupt Solyndra or the bankrupt Solar Trust of America, whose businesses are often entwined with Obama campaign bundlers. Although largely ignored by the MSM, these cases at least make their way into the public consciousness.

Perhaps even more dangerous than these corporate crony boondoggles, is the accumulated impact of the many small acts of corporate progressivism that align big business with big government, a recipe for tyranny. One such example is Arby’s Restaurant, which, late in the game, decided to “drop” advertizing on the Rush Limbaugh show, even though Arby’s is not and has never been a national sponsor of Rush’s program. The attack on Rush was made via Twitter, a favorite tool of the activist left.

But is corporate progressivism really a good strategy, considering that self identified conservatives outnumber liberals by nearly 2 to 1? In terms of wealth and disposable, one has to assume that the advantage to conservatives is greater still.

Yes, we surround them—a fact that is both disguised by the overwhelming predominance of liberals within the media, and under appreciated by corporate America. An attack on Rush’s advertisers is an attack on conservative speech. When advertisers fold to leftist intimidation (or in Arby’s case, just pile on), they join the war on conservatism.

The good news is that it appears that the sleeping giant has awakened. Conservatives are fighting back, and may even begin to turn the tide in their favor. After receiving much criticism via Twitter, Arby’s followed its Rush attack by blocking Twitter users who disagreed with the franchise. This tactic, however, appears to have compounded Arby’s problems. Try searching Twitter for @Arbys and you will see the negative attention Arby’s is getting. By my count, those who are outraged by the company’s progressive stance outnumber the supporters of the Media Matters, manufactured attack on Rush by 20 to 1.

In desperation, Arby’s is trying to undo the damage by unblocking their Twitter followers but they cannot put the genie back in the bottle.  The bottom line is that, under the leadership of its President, Hala Moddelmog (former CEO of Susan G. Komen for the Cure and Democratic donor), Arby’s appears to have made a poor  business decision for its shareholders, employees, and customers by joining the activist left in opposing free speech.

Perhaps this fiasco will cause the next corporation to think twice about aligning itself with the manufactured, anti-conservative bullying of the radical left. You see, not only do conservatives eat fast food, we can also tweet, and will happily find alternative providers to progressive businesses that align themselves with the leftists like these dropped sponsors of Rush.  Note, if you are a business that would like to gain market share from any of these corporate progs, please contact me here at http://johngaltlist.blogspot.com.

Sunday, April 8, 2012

Rush Limbaugh's Dropped Sponsors List

Below is the list--copied directly from the leftist http://stoprush.org/dropped-sponsors/ --of advertisers who have publicly stated that they will no longer run ads on Rush Limbaugh’s program. Note that we have not verified any of these. The "Statement" links send you back to the stoprush.org site. Please leave comments below or contact us if you have more information about any of these companies.
Please leave comments below if you have any more up-to-date information.  


Want to leverage conservative values such as individual freedom, personal responsibility, and limited government as a way differentiate YOUR business from progressive competitors like these?

Remember; we surround them. Self identified conservatives outnumber liberals by nearly 2 to 1. Contact us.

Monday, March 5, 2012

Grizzly and Wretched Don Imus Attacks Rush

The grizzly and wretched Don Imus went into a vicious tirade against Rush Limbaugh on his local morning show today. In defending the freeloading, "reproductive rights activist" and leftist, Imus contributed to the onslaught of progressive assault on free speech. The old goat gets more pathetic with each passing year.

Newt Rebuts Media Attack Dog David Gregory

Why we Love Newt. No one else seems able to turn the tables on the elite media the way he does.

In this clip, Newt excoriates progressive host David Gregory for dwelling on Rush Limbaugh's dust up with leftist activist Sandra Fluke instead of the monumental problems facing the country in order to protect Obama.

Monday, August 1, 2011

Rush Explains the Deception of Baseline Budgeting

On their road to economic destruction, politicians have built automatic increases into their already inflated levels of public spending. The Congressional Budget Offfice (CBO) refers to these automatic increases as the BASELINE. There is a presumption built into the baseline that every single budget item, from Social Security, to Food Stamps, to Ethanol or ACORN subsidies, will increase every single year between 3 and 7 percent. So, if we increase one of the many forms of redistribution by say, 6% instead of 7%, the CBO deceitfully scores this as a decrease of 1% instead of an actual dollar increase of 6%. Such political sleight of hand, blessed, of course, by the media, is how we move closer to Greece on a daily basis, despite all of the trillions of dollars in ‘spending cuts’ we hear about.

Rush provides this case-in-point to explain the sham of baseline budgeting: If we actually froze all federal spending at current levels, the CBO would score this as a $9.5 trillion cut. That’s because there is $9.5 trillion of increases already baked in our baseline over the next 10 years. What Obama and the Democrats (and the media and some Republicans) call a 'freeze' is actually a $9.5 trillion increase.

What they call 'deep cuts' of $2.5 trillion is actually piling on another $7 trillion to our already sky-high debt burden.